The Unsettling Currents: When Private Power Meets Public Peril
Our world is increasingly defined by shifting sands—from the battlefields where life-saving aid is delivered to the very fabric of governance and public safety. A closer look reveals a troubling convergence of profit, power, and escalating crises, challenging long-held principles and raising urgent questions about accountability and humanity itself.
A controversial trend is taking root in the global humanitarian landscape: private contracting firms, often led by former U.S. military and intelligence personnel, are stepping into aid delivery in the world’s most dangerous conflict zones. Companies like Fogbow, founded by a retired CIA officer and former senior defense official, are conducting air drops of food in South Sudan, paid for by the South Sudanese government. This initiative, they argue, leverages their expertise to operate effectively in difficult situations. Similarly, Safe Reach Solutions, another U.S. company led by retired U.S. security officers, is distributing aid in Gaza. This operation partners with a U.S.-backed nonprofit that Israel supports, with Israel stating its aim is to wrest control from the UN.
However, this development has sent shockwaves through the global aid community. Leading non-profit groups and the UN express alarm over the lack of transparency, humanitarian experience, and, crucially, the absence of commitment to core humanitarian principles like neutrality and operational independence in war zones. Critics argue that allowing combatant governments to dictate aid distribution risks politicizing life-saving assistance, potentially using it to control civilian populations or advance war aims, as seen with Israel’s stated plan to concentrate Gaza’s population in the south. Oxfam America’s director, Scott Paul, warns that a “truck and chuck” approach without proper humanitarian context “puts people at risk”.
The Norwegian Refugee Council points out that such arrangements can lead to preferential treatment for certain communities and make aid access intimidating for those in need. The UN World Food Program explicitly stated it is “not involved in the planning, targeting or distribution of food air-dropped by Fogbow on behalf of South Sudan’s government,” citing humanitarian principles. Mark Millar, an advisor on humanitarian matters, notes that private military contractors “have even less sympathy for a humanitarian perspective that complicates their business-driven model” and “once let loose, they seem to be even less accountable”.
Beyond the evolving nature of aid, the global stage remains fraught with tension. The Israel-Iran conflict, for instance, has escalated with deadly air raids and retaliatory strikes rocking both nations for nearly a week. Israel has reportedly bombed strategic Iranian locations, including a uranium centrifuge facility and a missile component factory, while Iran has retaliated with hundreds of missiles and drones, resulting in significant casualties. Amid this, the UK has withdrawn families of its diplomatic staff from Israel as a “precautionary measure”, and former U.S. President Donald Trump has made statements indicating potential U.S. involvement, calling Iran’s Supreme Leader an “easy target”. Even as institutions adapt, with Britain’s MI6 spy agency appointing its first female chief, the underlying currents of global challenge remain.
In Africa, internal challenges underscore systemic weaknesses. In Nigeria’s Plateau State, a former Speaker and 14 other ex-lawmakers were arrested over an alleged N2.5 billion vehicle scam, accused of illegally retaining luxury vehicles after leaving office and forcing the government to buy new ones for current legislators. This reflects a deep-seated issue of corruption.
Niger State has also been hit by a fresh round of devastating floods, submerging communities’ weeks after a previous tragedy killed over 200 and left 700 missing, highlighting a recurring humanitarian disaster compounded by environmental vulnerabilities.
In Kenya, protests against pervasive police brutality escalated when an Associated Press photographer captured a police officer shooting a civilian at close range during a demonstration in Nairobi, sparking outrage and leading to the officer’s arrest.
Beyond grand geopolitical shifts and the challenges of governance, individual narratives of injustice also emerge. Famed filmmaker Tyler Perry faces a substantial $260 million lawsuit from actor Derek Dixon, who alleges repeated sexual assault and harassment, accusing Perry of leveraging his industry power for exploitation.
The pursuit of justice and accountability, however imperfect, offers glimmers of progress amidst these crises. For example, Purdue Pharma’s $7 billion opioid settlement could finally advance, with 49 U.S. states backing the plan that includes significant payouts to individual victims. This marks a monumental step in holding drugmakers accountable for the opioid epidemic.
Yet, even attempts to ensure safety can have tragic outcomes. In Salt Lake City, a “safety volunteer” at a “No Kings” protest, a military veteran, inadvertently shot and killed a demonstrator while attempting to stop an alleged gunman who brandished a rifle. This incident highlights the complexities of public safety, especially in open-carry states, where good intentions can collide with chaotic realities.
From the controversial “aid for hire” model challenging humanitarian principles to ongoing conflicts, endemic corruption, and tragic incidents of violence on our streets, the narratives from around the world reveal a profound sense of instability. The blurring of lines between military and humanitarian roles, the persistent abuse of power, and the devastating impact of both natural and human-made disasters demand our attention. As citizens, understanding these complex dynamics and demanding accountability from all actors—be they governments, corporations, or individuals—is more critical than ever to navigate these unsettling currents and work towards a more stable and just future.
About Author
